<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/12988030?origin\x3dhttp://donttrustsnakes.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>


DON’T

TRUST

SNAKES


“I know where I'm headed.”
ROGER THORNHILL



Thursday, September 28, 2006

"You cannot be serious"

Well, dear ones, tonight I spent the time and energy I normally reserve for you writing a lengthy comment on another blog. Yesterday I made a very terse comment on an entry there about Enron that included a remarkable sentence: "However, let's be clear, there was no fraud here." I said there was obviously Rule 10b-5 securities fraud.

Today I found that one of the blog's authors had devoted an entire long entry to refuting my little shorthand riff on Rule 10b-5. The entry, entitled "SEC Rule 10b-5 and Enron" begins with a link to the rule's Wikipedia entry and then goes on for more than 600 words, and concludes, without ever mentioning or alluding to Rule 10b-5. So I just had to leave a reasoned comment—and fast: the challenge of shooting a fish in a coffee can is getting off a clean shot before the fish suffocates.

Anyway, here are links to the two posts, each of which includes a comment from me. Go on, it will be fun. You'll get to see me at my polite and devastating best.

"Fastow got 6 years"

"SEC Rule 10b-5 and Enron"

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home