Studio 60
If the show respected its audience, the comedy bits would be of a higher quality. If the show respected the medium it is supposed to be depicting, sketch comedy, the comedy bits would be of a higher quality. But in actual point of fact, the comedy bits are dreadful filler that wouldn't have made it onto SNL at its Mary Gross nadir (which is saying a lot). Do Sorkin and company think that the audience can't detect that this material is dreck? That because people were willing to believe the White House operated any old way they wrote it, they will believe any old thing they write is funny? If they respected the medium of sketch comedy, they would hire some actual established comedy writers to create a fair approximation of it on the show. But it's painfully evident that they didn't do this, hubristically supposing they would be able to whip it up along with everything else they were writing for the show.
I think a big reason the ratings have tanked is that the audience resists identifying with the show's supposedly tops-in-their-profession characters because those characters don't recognize the sketch comedy bits as awful. Hence, they are not believable characters. Hence, no one cares about them.
Labels: Studio 60, television
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home